On Sun, 2006-10-08 20:15:46 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 08:04:37PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-10-08 19:59:08 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Read the bug report: Seems it > > > > was actually caused by a non-initialized variable introduced by a > > > > patch to util-linux. > > > > > > It was the sum of two independent bugs, and one of them was a kernel bug. > > > > Without reading the sources but only the bug report, my impression is > > that the kernel code is correct. > > It seems you missed Comment #1 when reading the bug report? Indeed. I'm sorry. MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw [email protected] +49-172-7608481 Signature of: Lauf nicht vor Deinem Glück davon: the second : Es könnte hinter Dir stehen!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)
- From: "Pekka Enberg" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)
- From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)
- From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Char: nozomi, bad comment sings
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)
- Index(es):
 |