Re: [patch] honour MNT_NOEXEC for access()

Stas Sergeev  wrote:
>Now, as the access(X_OK) is fixed, would it be
>feasible for ld.so to start using it?

access() has TOCTTOU vulnerabilities, and should not be used for
any security-critical purpose...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [patch] honour MNT_NOEXEC for access()
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] honour MNT_NOEXEC for access()
    • From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] honour MNT_NOEXEC for access()
    • From: Stas Sergeev <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [TULIP] Check the return value from pci_set_mwi()
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] minimal alpha pt_regs fixes
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] honour MNT_NOEXEC for access()
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] honour MNT_NOEXEC for access()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]