On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:27:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:38:31 -0400
>
> > As for why the flag may be missing -- PCI MSI interrupts are never
> > shared. However, it won't _hurt_ anything to set the flag needlessly,
> > AFAIK.
>
> That's right.
Just to make sure I understood: does this means that the code at lines
296 and 297 in e1000_main.c can be safely removed?
296 if (adapter->have_msi)
297 flags &= ~IRQF_SHARED;
298 #endif
299 if ((err = request_irq(adapter->pdev->irq, &e1000_intr, flags,
300 netdev->name, netdev)))
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
