Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps

You keep repeating the same nonsense over and over again, lot listening
to anybody who doesn't agree with your position.

If you don't want to have the noexec semantics on a filesystem, remove
it.  Not using the strict (mmap + protect) makes the whole thing
completely meaningless since ld.so can be invoked directly.

If anything breaks for  you, remove the noexec  mount flag.  But don't
argue that because noexec doesn't provide 100% security (which it cannot
alone, of course) it needs not be strict at all.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
    • From: Stas Sergeev <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
    • From: Stas Sergeev <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
• Next by Date: Re: wpa supplicant/ipw3945, ESSID last char missing
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC mmaps
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]