A benchmark
'postal -p 16 localhost list_of_1000_users'
56% of run time waits for flock_lock_file_wait;
Vmstat reports that 66% cpu is idle and vmstat bi+bo=3600 (far from
max).
Postfix server with FD_SETSIZE=2048 was used.
Similar results got for sendmail.
Wchan is counted by
while :; do
ps -o user,wchan=WIDE-WCHAN-COLUMN,comm;
sleep 1;
done | awk '/ postfix /{a[$2]++}END{for (i in a) print
a[i]"\t"i}'
If ext2 fs is used the Postal throughput is twice more and bi+bo by 50%
less while flock_lock_file_wait 60% still.
Is flock_lock_file_wait considered as a performance limiting waiting for
similar applications in smp?
Leonid
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
