Re: [PATCH 24 of 28] IB/mthca - Fix compiler warnings with gcc4 on possible unitialized variables

Roland Dreier wrote:

NAK -- I don't want to generate worse code to fix a compiler warning
false positive.

Maybe we should have a "make defined" operation for this kind of thing:

   #define DEFVALUE(x)   asm("" : "=rm" (x))

Which is pretty ugly, I admit...

   J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 24 of 28] IB/mthca - Fix compiler warnings with gcc4 on possible unitialized variables
    • From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 24 of 28] IB/mthca - Fix compiler warnings with gcc4 on possible unitialized variables
    • From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18-1.2689.fc6PAE: oops in ext3_clear_inode+0x52/0x8b
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 24 of 28] IB/mthca - Fix compiler warnings with gcc4 on possible unitialized variables
• Next by thread: [PATCH 25 of 28] IB/ipath - Set CPU affinity early
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]