Re: [PATCH 2/2] AFS: Manage AFS modularity vs FS-Cache modularity

On Fri, 22 September 2006 15:17:51 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> 
> Well, AFS_FS is itself marked as being experimental, so I'm not sure that the
> AFS_FSCACHE option needs to be also.

Good point.  The other typo should be fairly obvious, though.

Jörn

-- 
Fancy algorithms are slow when n is small, and n is usually small.
Fancy algorithms have big constants. Until you know that n is
frequently going to be big, don't get fancy.
-- Rob Pike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 2/2] AFS: Manage AFS modularity vs FS-Cache modularity
    • From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 1/2] NFS: Manage NFS modularity vs FS-Cache modularity
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 2/2] AFS: Manage AFS modularity vs FS-Cache modularity
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/2] AFS: Manage AFS modularity vs FS-Cache modularity
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Poor scheduling when not loaded at 100% (Was: [PATCH] sched.c: Be a bit more conservative in SMP)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm 5/6] mm: Print first block offset for swap areas
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] AFS: Manage AFS modularity vs FS-Cache modularity
• Next by thread: [PATCH 0/7] Using %gs for per-cpu areas on x86
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]