The inode diet patch in -mm unhooked xfs_preferred_iosize from the stat call:
--- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_vnode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_vnode.c
@@ -122,7 +122,6 @@ vn_revalidate_core(
inode->i_blocks = vap->va_nblocks;
inode->i_mtime = vap->va_mtime;
inode->i_ctime = vap->va_ctime;
- inode->i_blksize = vap->va_blocksize;
if (vap->va_xflags & XFS_XFLAG_IMMUTABLE)
This in turn breaks the largeio mount option for xfs:
largeio/nolargeio
If "nolargeio" is specified, the optimal I/O reported in
st_blksize by stat(2) will be as small as possible to allow user
applications to avoid inefficient read/modify/write I/O.
If "largeio" specified, a filesystem that has a "swidth" specified
will return the "swidth" value (in bytes) in st_blksize. If the
filesystem does not have a "swidth" specified but does specify
an "allocsize" then "allocsize" (in bytes) will be returned
instead.
If neither of these two options are specified, then filesystem
will behave as if "nolargeio" was specified.
and the (undocumented?) allocsize mount option as well.
For a filesystem like this with sunit/swidth specified,
meta-data=/dev/sda1 isize=512 agcount=32, agsize=7625840 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=0
data = bsize=4096 blocks=244026880, imaxpct=25
= sunit=16 swidth=16 blks, unwritten=1
naming =version 2 bsize=4096
log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=32768, version=1
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks
realtime =none extsz=65536 blocks=0, rtextents=0
stat on a stock FC6 kernel w/ the largeio mount option returns only the page size:
[root@link-07]# mount -o largeio /dev/sda1 /mnt/test/
[root@link-07]# stat -c %o /mnt/test/foo
4096
with the following patch, it does what it should:
[root@link-07]# mount -o largeio /dev/sda1 /mnt/test/
[root@link-07]# stat -c %o /mnt/test/foo
65536
same goes for filesystems w/o sunit,swidth but with the allocsize mount option.
stock:
[root@link-07]# mount -o largeio,allocsize=32768 /dev/sda1 /mnt/test/
[root@link-07]# stat -c %o /mnt/test/foo
4096
w/ patch:
[root@link-07# mount -o largeio,allocsize=32768 /dev/sda1 /mnt/test/
[root@link-07]# stat -c %o /mnt/test/foo
32768
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>
XFS guys, does this look ok?
Index: linux-2.6.18/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c
+++ linux-2.6.18/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c
@@ -623,12 +623,16 @@ xfs_vn_getattr(
{
struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
bhv_vnode_t *vp = vn_from_inode(inode);
+ xfs_inode_t *ip;
int error = 0;
if (unlikely(vp->v_flag & VMODIFIED))
error = vn_revalidate(vp);
- if (!error)
+ if (!error) {
generic_fillattr(inode, stat);
+ ip = xfs_vtoi(vp);
+ stat->blksize = xfs_preferred_iosize(ip->i_mount);
+ }
return -error;
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
