Re: __STRICT_ANSI__ checks in headers

On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 12:00 +0300, Ismail Donmez wrote:
> This looks way cleaner, I can cook up a patch for this if everyone
> agrees.  What do you guys think? 

Makes sense.

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: __STRICT_ANSI__ checks in headers
    • From: Ismail Donmez <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: __STRICT_ANSI__ checks in headers
    • From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
  • Re: __STRICT_ANSI__ checks in headers
    • From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Blackfin: Serial driver for Blackfin arch on 2.6.18
• Next by Date: Re: Historic Linux 2.4 GIT repository
• Previous by thread: Re: __STRICT_ANSI__ checks in headers
• Next by thread: Re: __STRICT_ANSI__ checks in headers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]