Re: [PATCH] sched.c: Be a bit more conservative in SMP

Vincent Pelletier <vincent.plr <at> wanadoo.fr> writes:
> I'll do some tests soon to see which version gives better performance at a 
> higher level than just process migration cost - if different at all.

I think that your patch should improve the performance because process
migrations are expensive (cache miss) and should be avoided when not 
really necessary.

Cheers,

  Ludovic.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] sched.c: Be a bit more conservative in SMP
    • From: "Antonio Vargas" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] sched.c: Be a bit more conservative in SMP
    • From: Vincent Pelletier <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched.c: Be a bit more conservative in SMP
    • From: Vincent Pelletier <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched.c: Be a bit more conservative in SMP
    • From: Vincent Pelletier <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: tracing - consensus building insteat of dogfights
• Next by Date: 2.6.18-rc7 boot only with acpi=off
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched.c: Be a bit more conservative in SMP
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched.c: Be a bit more conservative in SMP
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]