On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:00:30 +0100
David Woodhouse <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm coming to the conclusion that if there are flash chips which
> inherit the Intel insanity of automatically locking themselves on
> every power cycle, thus rendering the 'locked' status meaningless, we
> should just automatically unlock the whole chip at boot time, from
> the _chip_ driver.
Yeah, there really is no reason to keep anything "soft locked". I'll
unlock the chip from the fixup I submitted earlier so that it comes up
unlocked by default.
> So it's trapped for moderation and I
> get to look at it and manually approve it.
I'll keep doing it, then. That way, I can be sure that you'll notice my
patches, too ;)
Thanks,
Haavard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
