Re: [linux-pm] OpPoint summary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/14/06, Auke Kok <[email protected]> wrote:
David Singleton wrote:

> +static const struct cpu_id cpu_ids[] = {
> +       [CPU_BANIAS]    = { 6,  9, 5 },
> +       [CPU_DOTHAN_A1] = { 6, 13, 1 },
> +       [CPU_DOTHAN_A2] = { 6, 13, 2 },
> +       [CPU_DOTHAN_B0] = { 6, 13, 6 },
> +       [CPU_MP4HT_D0]  = {15,  3, 4 },
> +       [CPU_MP4HT_E0]  = {15,  4, 1 },
> +};


Any reason why { 6, 13, 8 } is missing? My lenovo T43 identifies itself as such:

processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 13
model name      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.86GHz
stepping        : 8

I'm not sure a Dothan B1 exists, but some postings suggest even C0 and C1 are
valid steppings. I'm sure OpPoint could work with those as well.

Heh, that shows pretty much that the approach itself is not good...
And this is only beginning.

Vitaly
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux