Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)

On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 12:10:31PM -0700, Rohit Seth wrote:
> It seems that a single notion of limit should suffice, and that limit
> should more be treated as something beyond which that resource
> consumption in the container will be throttled/not_allowed.

The big question is : are containers/RG allowed to use *upto* their
limit always? In other words, will you typically setup limits such that
sum of all limits = max resource capacity? 

If it is setup like that, then what you are considering as limit is
actually guar no?

If it wont be setup like that, then I dont see how one can provide QoS.

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
    • From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
    • From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
    • From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
    • From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
    • From: Pavel Emelianov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
    • From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
    • From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
    • From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
    • From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
• Next by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
• Previous by thread: Re: [Devel] Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
• Next by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]