On Tuesday 12 September 2006 08:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >Isn't a Kconfig patch missing? I don't see any place that defines
> >CONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME. Actually Kconfig wouldn't
> >be very good for this, so auto testing would be preferable
> >(like the cfi test is doing)
>
> Using that framework was the intention (you used a CONFIG_
> prefix there, and so did I), but as I wasn't sure about its status,
> and as I also was doing this against plain 2.6.18-rc6, I didn't add
> the actual detection logic. Actually I also think that should be
> done a little differently to allow for better future extension, i.e.
> instead of adding to CFLAGS store the auto-detected results in
> a header and forcibly -include it.
Ok. I guess I'll do it in the same way as the CFI detection
and maybe one of the kbuild folks can figure out a better way longer term.
BTW which binutils release started supporting this properly?
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
