Re: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 + all hotfixes -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/5/06, Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:37:51 -0700
"Miles Lane" <[email protected]> wrote:

> ieee1394: Node changed: 0-01:1023 -> 0-00:1023
> ieee1394: Node changed: 0-02:1023 -> 0-01:1023
> ieee1394: Node suspended: ID:BUS[0-00:1023]  GUID[0080880002103eae]
>
> =============================================
> [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 #2
> ---------------------------------------------
> knodemgrd_0/2321 is trying to acquire lock:
>  (&s->rwsem){----}, at: [<f8958897>] nodemgr_probe_ne+0x311/0x38d [ieee1394]
>
> but task is already holding lock:
>  (&s->rwsem){----}, at: [<f8959078>] nodemgr_host_thread+0x717/0x883 [ieee1394]
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
> 2 locks held by knodemgrd_0/2321:
>  #0:  (nodemgr_serialize){--..}, at: [<c11e76cd>]
> mutex_lock_interruptible+0x1c/0x21
>  #1:  (&s->rwsem){----}, at: [<f8959078>]
> nodemgr_host_thread+0x717/0x883 [ieee1394]
>
> stack backtrace:
>  [<c1003c97>] dump_trace+0x69/0x1b7
>  [<c1003dfa>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x15/0x28
>  [<c10040f5>] show_trace+0x16/0x19
>  [<c1004110>] dump_stack+0x18/0x1d
>  [<c102f1e1>] __lock_acquire+0x7a2/0x9f8
>  [<c102f70a>] lock_acquire+0x56/0x74
>  [<c102b805>] down_write+0x27/0x41
>  [<f8958897>] nodemgr_probe_ne+0x311/0x38d [ieee1394]
>  [<f8959098>] nodemgr_host_thread+0x737/0x883 [ieee1394]
>  [<c1028c19>] kthread+0xaf/0xde
>  [<c100397b>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> DWARF2 unwinder stuck at kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
>
> Leftover inexact backtrace:
>
>  [<c1003dfa>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x15/0x28
>  [<c10040f5>] show_trace+0x16/0x19
>  [<c1004110>] dump_stack+0x18/0x1d
>  [<c102f1e1>] __lock_acquire+0x7a2/0x9f8
>  [<c102f70a>] lock_acquire+0x56/0x74
>  [<c102b805>] down_write+0x27/0x41
>  [<f8958897>] nodemgr_probe_ne+0x311/0x38d [ieee1394]
>  [<f8959098>] nodemgr_host_thread+0x737/0x883 [ieee1394]
>  [<c1028c19>] kthread+0xaf/0xde
>  [<c100397b>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
>  =======================
> ieee1394: Node resumed: ID:BUS[0-00:1023]  GUID[0080880002103eae]
> ieee1394: Node changed: 0-00:1023 -> 0-01:1023
> ieee1394: Node changed: 0-01:1023 -> 0-02:1023

That's a 1394 glitch, possibly introduced by git-ieee1394.patch.

Would you like me to verify that removing the patch fixes it, or
should I wait for the 2.6.18-rc6-mm1 tree?

Thanks,
     Miles
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux