Re: [PATCH 10/18] 2.6.17.9 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch support

On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:06:01 -0700
Stephane Eranian <[email protected]> wrote:

> +#define PFM_LAST_CPU(ctx, act) \
> +	((ctx)->last_cpu == smp_processor_id() && (ctx)->last_act == act)

Hiding this in a macro rather invites mistakes.  Has all this code been
thoroughly tested with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT, to detect use of
smp_processor_id() in preemptible code?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 10/18] 2.6.17.9 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch support
    • From: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [RFC][PATCH] Manage jbd allocations from its own slabs
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/18] 2.6.17.9 perfmon2 patch for review: generic kernel modifications
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 10/18] 2.6.17.9 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch support
• Next by thread: [PATCH 11/18] 2.6.17.9 perfmon2 patch for review: file related operations support
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]