Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD

On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 02:42:26PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov ([email protected]) wrote:
> > Hence the alternative allocator to use on tight memory conditions.
> 
> If transferred to your implementation, then just steal some pages from
> SLAB when new network device is added and use them when OOM happens.
> It is much simpler and can help in the most of situations.

And just to make things clear - I do not insult your implementation 
in any way, it can be 100% correct and behave perfectly.
I'm just saying that there are other methods to solve the problem which
seems to me more appropriate.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
    • From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]