On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 07:14 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > Drawback would be some more TLB misses.
> > >
> > > yup. On some (important) architectures - I'm not sure which architectures
> > > do the bigpage-for-kernel trick.
> >
> > I looked at optimizing the per-cpu data accessors on PowerPC and only
> > ever saw fractions of a percent change in overall performance, which
> > says to me that we don't actually use per-cpu data all that much. So
> > unless you make per-cpu data really really slow, I doubt that we'll
> > see any significant performance difference.
>
> The main problem is that we would need a "vmalloc reserve first; allocate pages
> later" interface. On x86 it would be easy by just splitting up vmalloc/vmap a bit
> again. Does anybody else see problems with implementing that on any
> other architecture?
"vmalloc reserve first; allocate pages later" would be a really nice
feature. We could use this on s390 to implement the virtual mem_map
array spanning the whole 64 bit address range (with holes in it). To
make it perfect a "deallocate pages; keep vmalloc reserve" should be
added, then we could free parts of the mem_map array again on hot memory
remove.
I don't see a problem for s390.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
Martin Schwidefsky
Linux for zSeries Development & Services
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
