Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller

Doesnt the ability to move tasks between groups dynamically affect
(atleast) memory controller design (in giving up ownership etc)?

we save object owner on the object. So if you change the container,
objects are still correctly charged to the creator and are uncharged
correctly on free.

Seems like the object owner should also change when the object moves
from one container to another.

Consider a file which is opened in 2 processes. one of the processes
wants to move to another container then. How would you decide whether
to change the file owner or not?

Kirill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
    • From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH]: initialize parts of udf inode earlier in create
• Next by Date: Re: [ProbableSpam] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]