On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:40:09 +0530
Dipankar Sarma <[email protected]> wrote:
> > So my take was "looks good, done deal - let's go get some sane controllers
> > working". And now this!
>
> My recollection from the BoF is that people felt interface wasn't a major
> issue and it wasn't discussed much. Most of the discussion centered
> around grouping of tasks and the mem/cpu controllers and some additional
> resource control requirements from openvz folks.
OK. That's certainly the area to be concentrating on.
> One way to go forward with the interface could be to request Chandra
> to repost the ckrm infrastructure and see if the stake holders (primarily
> container folks) can review and agree on it.
Fine. But let's separate that activity from the primary one: worrying
about the controllers.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
