Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH] memory hotadd fixes [4/5] avoid check in acpi

On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:46:53 +0900
Yasunori Goto <[email protected]> wrote:

> BTW, I prefer that we should fix only bug at this time for 2.6.18.
> But, I really confusing that current patches are for only bug fix or
> including for small memory hole case.
> IIRC, small memory hole need more works. So, it should be 2.6.19
> or later. Right?
> Kame-san, could you divide between just fix patch and considering
> small hole case? Or all of patches are for only bug fix?
> 
Hm.

patch [1/5], [2/5], [3/5], [5/5]  are *necessary* bug fixes.
patch [4/5] is for memory hot add with small chunks.

But in other view, it's bug that only the first memory chunk can be added
at hot-add if there is small memory hole in a section 

Thanks,
-Kame

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] memory hotadd fixes [4/5] avoid check in acpi
    • From: keith mannthey <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] memory hotadd fixes [4/5] avoid check in acpi
    • From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] memory hotadd fixes [4/5] avoid check in acpi
    • From: Yasunori Goto <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: problems with e1000 and jumboframes
• Next by Date: Re: Can someone explain under what condition inode cache pages can be swapped out?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] memory hotadd fixes [4/5] avoid check in acpi
• Next by thread: [PATCH] memory hotadd fixes [5/5] avoid registering res twice
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]