On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 04:51:38PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> >
> >On different architectures, we have the following values for
> >COMMAND_LINE_SIZE:
> >- 256
> >- 512
> >- 896
> >- 1024
> >- 4096
> >
> >What should be the common value?
> >4096?
> >
> >And I have a rough memory of some dependencies of COMMAND_LINE_SIZE and
> >boot loaders. What exactly must be taken care of when increasing
> >COMMAND_LINE_SIZE?
> >
>
> It's architecture-dependent; it probably should be defined in something
> like <asm/cmdline.h>.
OK, I did misunderstand you.
I tought you were saying it should be the same value for all
architectures.
With the exception of frv (in param.h), COMMAND_LINE_SIZE is in setup.h
on all architectures.
Do we want to move it to a different header, or simply make param.h a
userspace header on all architectures?
> -hpa
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
