Re: [stable] [PATCH] initramfs: Allow rootfs to use tmpfs instead of ramfs

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Al Boldi wrote:
> > Well, ramfs has some pitfalls, which doesn't make it suitable for a
> > long-lived rootfs.  OTOH, tmpfs is much more mature, while semantically
> > the same.
> >
> > Being semantically the same, while not exhibiting ramfs pitfalls, makes
> > it suitable to be pushed into the -stable tree, IMHO.
>
> This is total nonsense.

Are you sure?

> They're very different from an implementation standpoint.

Think ext2/3.


Thanks!

--
Al

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [stable] [PATCH] initramfs: Allow rootfs to use tmpfs instead of ramfs
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] initramfs: Allow rootfs to use tmpfs instead of ramfs
    • From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
  • Re: [stable] [PATCH] initramfs: Allow rootfs to use tmpfs instead of ramfs
    • From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
  • Re: [stable] [PATCH] initramfs: Allow rootfs to use tmpfs instead of ramfs
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [stable] [PATCH] initramfs: Allow rootfs to use tmpfs instead of ramfs
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86 built-in command line (resend)
• Previous by thread: Re: [stable] [PATCH] initramfs: Allow rootfs to use tmpfs instead of ramfs
• Next by thread: Re: [stable] [PATCH] initramfs: Allow rootfs to use tmpfs instead of ramfs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]