Re: [patch] x86_64: fix is_at_popf() for compat tasks

 
> How about checking for regs->cs != __USER_CS instead?  In 64-bit mode
> a program shouldn't have any other value there while in 32-bit mode
> it could be using LDT segments.


It could in theory, but it shouldn't agreed.  Added thanks.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [patch] x86_64: fix is_at_popf() for compat tasks
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 built-in command line
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] x86_64: fix is_at_popf() for compat tasks
• Next by thread: [PATCH 000 of 9] md: Introduction - assorted cleanup and minor fixes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]