Re: [PATCH] x86 built-in command line (resend)

On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 12:07:02PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Matt Mackall wrote:
> >I'm resending this as-is because the earlier thread petered out
> >without any strong arguments against this approach. x86_64 patch to
> >follow.
> 
> "No strong arguments?"
> 
> I still maintain that this patch has the wrong priority in case more 
> than one set of arguments are provided.

But you still haven't answered how that lets you work around firmware
that passes parameters you don't like.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] x86 built-in command line (resend)
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] x86 built-in command line (resend)
    • From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] x86 built-in command line (resend)
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [stable] [PATCH] initramfs: Allow rootfs to use tmpfs instead of ramfs
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] add-imacfb-docu-and-detection.patch
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86 built-in command line (resend)
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86 built-in command line (resend)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]