Re: [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption

> Paul can you please test the mainline code and confirm?

This will take me a few hours - it requires a bit of
slab debugging scaffolding to detect the memory corruption
in a timely and accurate manner.  I'll have to port that
scaffolding forward from its current SLES10 base.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [2.6.18-rc2-mm1] libata ate one PATA channel
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] x86_64: fix is_at_popf() for compat tasks
• Previous by thread: Re: [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption
• Next by thread: Re: [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]