Re: [PATCH] slab: respect architecture and caller mandated alignment

On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Heiko Carstens wrote:

> > You may want to document that change somewhere.
> 
> It is already documented (see top of slab.c). The only thing that was 
> wrong was that ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN and ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN didn't have 
> the effect like one would expect from the documentation.

Some of the passages there are a bit fuzzy to me. This is the first time 
though that we enforce these alignments for the SLAB_DEBUG case.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] slab: respect architecture and caller mandated alignment
    • From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] slab: respect architecture and caller mandated alignment
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] slab: respect architecture and caller mandated alignment
    • From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Generic battery interface
• Next by Date: Re: Generic battery interface
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] slab: respect architecture and caller mandated alignment
• Next by thread: Generic battery interface
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]