Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel

Pete,

Thanks for the reply.

> > All right then. I'll send you a patch that backports the string caching
> > mechanism from 2.6 in a few days. Would you be able to test it with the
> > 210PU?
>
> Yes, that would be fine.
We should get back to you in a couple weeks with this.

> Although I am starting to think about creating a custom locking
> scheme in devio.c after all. It seems like less work.
What's your timeframe for this? Good luck with it.

Thanks,

Ben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel
    • From: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel
    • From: Benjamin Cherian <[email protected]>
  • Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel
    • From: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: e1000: "fix" it on thinkpad x60 / eeprom checksum read fails
• Next by Date: Re: Re: [PATCH] drivers: Conversions from kmalloc+memset to k(z|c)alloc.
• Previous by thread: Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel
• Next by thread: Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]