Re: Generic B-tree implementation

On 7/18/06, Gary Funck <[email protected]> wrote:

I liked your B-tree implementation, and have saved a copy.  Too bad there
isn't the C/C++ equivalent of CPAN (comp.unix.sources is so passe`).  Your
B-tree implementation would make a nice addition to an archive of
handy C algorithm implementations.

FWIW C++ has http://boost.org/... and C has /usr/lib/ :)

-Bob
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: Generic B-tree implementation
    • From: "Vishal Patil" <[email protected]>
  • RE: Generic B-tree implementation
    • From: "Gary Funck" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 0 of 2] Resend: x86-64: Calgary IOMMU updates
• Next by Date: Re: kernel/timer.c: next_timer_interrupt() strange/buggy(?) code (2.6.18-rc1-mm2)
• Previous by thread: RE: Generic B-tree implementation
• Next by thread: Re: Generic B-tree implementation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]