Re: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability]

Hi.

On Wednesday 12 July 2006 20:09, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> We're doing something like you are, but I think we're using some other
> option in LZF, because the resulting image size is 30-40% of the
> uncompressed one. That's better for encryption later on, but obviously not
> for speed.

Maybe it's just that the caches compress better? 50% is common, but lower 
values are sometimes seen.

Regards,

Nigel
-- 
Nigel, Michelle and Alisdair Cunningham
5 Mitchell Street
Cobden 3266
Victoria, Australia

Attachment: pgpVhXuJTbBcc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• References:
  • Re: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability]
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability]
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability]
• Next by Date: Re: DMA memory, split_page, BUG_ON(PageCompound()), sound
• Previous by thread: Re: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability]
• Next by thread: Re: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]