On Tue, Jul 11, Olaf Hering wrote: > My point is: Of course thats not the only one. If nothing changes in userspace, it still has to be build with every new kernel no matter how many other kernel changes were just added. I remember it took some time to build klibc-0.123. And if klibc really depends on kernel headers, and I do git-bisect on a slower box, thats a waste of time. That really asks for an external binary. Or CONFIG_KLIBC=n, if thats not convincing. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: klibc and what's the next step?
- From: Michael Tokarev <[email protected]>
- Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
- Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
- Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
- Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
- Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
- Re: klibc and what's the next step?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc1] Make group sorting optional in the 2.6.x kernels
- Next by Date: Re: Will there be Intel Wireless 3945ABG support?
- Previous by thread: Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- Next by thread: Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?
- Index(es):
 |