Re: [patch] i386: handle_BUG(): don't print garbage if debug info unavailable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/11/06, Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> OK but you don't need a do/while(0) here.

Actually, the way Andrew wrote it, it _is_ needed. It does two things:

 - it's the block scope that allows the private variables
 - if the "get_user()" fails, the "break" means that you don't have to
   have a goto.

<pedantry> The latter is true, but the former can also be done with
just bare braces:

 int a=4;
 {   int a=3;  printf("%d ",a); /* 3 */  }
 printf("%d ",a); /* 4 */

</pedantry, only useful to those who wish to write ugly code or source
code parsers>

Not being a person with actual *useful* skills, I can't comment on the
__get_user() issue :-).

Ray
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux