Re: [RFC 5/8] x86_64 without ZONE_DMA

On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:

> I don't think the savings from this are enough to bother
> the user with such an obscure config option.

The savings are not only from the code paths. The VM itself is cleaner and 
the balancing issues are not that troublesome anymore.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC 5/8] x86_64 without ZONE_DMA
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC 0/8] Optional ZONE_DMA
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • [RFC 5/8] x86_64 without ZONE_DMA
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC 5/8] x86_64 without ZONE_DMA
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC 4/8] page allocator: Optional ZONE_DMA
• Next by Date: Re: [linux-pm] [BUG] sleeping function called from invalid context during resume
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 5/8] x86_64 without ZONE_DMA
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC 5/8] x86_64 without ZONE_DMA
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]