Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-mm1 2/2] sched_domains: Allocate sched_groups dynamically

On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 05:34:17PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> > In short, multi-core was broken too and Srivatsa's patch fixed it.
> 
> Thanks for your quick response, Suresh.
> 
> My test earlier today that showed multi-core -not- broken must
> have been flawed.
> 
> I will rerun them tomorrow, carefully.

It is quite possible that the kernel you are testing doesn't have multi-core
scheduler domain. If so, then you may not run into this issue.

thanks,
suresh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-mm1 2/2] sched_domains: Allocate sched_groups dynamically
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-mm1 2/2] sched_domains: Allocate sched_groups dynamically
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-mm1 2/2] sched_domains: Allocate sched_groups dynamically
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-mm1 2/2] sched_domains: Allocate sched_groups dynamically
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 8/19] UML - ifdef a mode-specific function
• Next by Date: Re: Linux v2.6.18-rc1: printk delays
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-mm1 2/2] sched_domains: Allocate sched_groups dynamically
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-mm1 2/2] sched_domains: Allocate sched_groups dynamically
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]