Re: [PATCH 1/2] batch-write.patch

Andrew Morton wrote:

>
> It's called at the same
>level as ->prepare_write/commit_write so if there's any logic to this, it's
>logical that batched_write be an a_op too.
>  
>
I agree that prepare_write/commit_write should be the same as
batch_write, but maybe they all should be file ops?

vs will send a patch which makes batch_write an a_op tomorrow.....

Hans
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] batch-write.patch
    • From: "Vladimir V. Saveliev" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] batch-write.patch
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] batch-write.patch
    • From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] batch-write.patch
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm: moving dirty pages balancing to pdfludh entirely
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] change netdevice to use struct device instead of struct class_device
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] batch-write.patch
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] batch-write.patch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]