On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 17:34:18 EDT, Bill Davidsen said: > I think he is talking about another problem. RAID addresses detectable > failures at the hardware level. I believe that he wants validation after > the data is returned (without error) from the device. While in most > cases if what you wrote and what you read don't match it's memory, > improving the chances of catching the error is useful, given that > non-server often lacks ECC on memory, or people buy cheaper non-parity > memory. There's other issues as well. Why do people run 'tripwire' on boxes that have RAID on them?
Attachment:
pgpCJshundnY5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ext4 features
- From: Helge Hafting <[email protected]>
- Re: ext4 features
- From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
- Re: ext4 features
- From: Bruce Ferrell <[email protected]>
- Re: ext4 features
- References:
- ext4 features
- From: Thomas Glanzmann <[email protected]>
- Re: ext4 features
- From: Tomasz Torcz <[email protected]>
- Re: ext4 features
- From: Thomas Glanzmann <[email protected]>
- Re: ext4 features
- From: Tomasz Torcz <[email protected]>
- Re: ext4 features
- From: Helge Hafting <[email protected]>
- Re: ext4 features
- From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
- ext4 features
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.17-mm6
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.17-mm3: swsusp fails when process is debugged by ptrace
- Previous by thread: Re: ext4 features
- Next by thread: Re: ext4 features
- Index(es):
 |