Re: 2.6.17-mm4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Alan Cox <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ar Gwe, 2006-06-30 am 01:05 +0200, ysgrifennodd Ingo Molnar:
> > it does things like:
> > 
> >         static const unsigned long qd_port[2] = { 0x30, 0xB0 };
> >         static const unsigned long ide_port[2] = { 0x170, 0x1F0 };
> > 
> >         [...]
> >                 unsigned long port = qd_port[i];
> >         [...]
> >                         r = inb_p(port);
> >                         outb_p(0x19, port);
> >                         res = inb_p(port);
> >                         outb_p(r, port);
> > 
> > so it reads/writes port 0x30 and 0xb0. Are those used by something else 
> > on modern hardware?
> 
> Not especially. Perhaps the best thing to do here would be to make qdi 
> compiled into the kernel (as opposed to modular) only do so if 
> "probe_qdi=1" or similar is set.

ok. Is that the standard way of dealing with potentially intrusive 
probes?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux