On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 14:50 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> A facility like this doesn't belong in some arbitrary driver layer.
> It belongs as a generic facility the whole kernel could make use
> of.
It could, indeed. In fact, we had that discussion here before I sent
this patch in. It presumably wants to live in lib/, and acquire a more
generic name. What name will capture the uncached-read-but-cached-write
semantics in a useful fashion? memcpy_nc?
<b
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]