Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: Suspend2 - Request for review & inclusion in -mm)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 2006-06-29 00:37:57, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Thursday 29 June 2006 00:24, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > Okay, can I get some details? Like how much memory does system have,
> > > > what stress test causes the failure?
> > >
> > > The machine has 1GB of RAM, filling it up beyond 500MB, maybe 600MB
> > > usually made swsusp a problem. I'd need to close apps then to be able to
> > > suspend.
> >
> > I'm pretty sure I do suspending with most of RAM full. You have
> > big-enough swap partition, right?
> 
> 1 GB, it might not be completely empty though. I probably only hit swsusp 
> limit much earlier than suspend2's (which after 34 suspend/resume cycles and 
> heavy use in between I did not hit yet). 

Okay, can we get bugzilla.kernel.org report? (assigned-to me)

This really should not happen, and I did not see swsusp fail like that
for quite a long time. I _could_ make it fail with make -j on kernel,
and similar crazy loads, but on nothing reasonable.

dmesg from failed run would be nice, too.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux