Hello,
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Thinking about this I am going to suggest a slightly different direction
> for get a patchset we can merge.
>
> First we concentrate on the fundamentals.
> - How we mark a device as belonging to a specific network namespace.
> - How we mark a socket as belonging to a specific network namespace.
>
> As part of the fundamentals we add a patch to the generic socket code
> that by default will disable it for protocol families that do not indicate
> support for handling network namespaces, on a non-default network namespace.
>
> I think that gives us a path that will allow us to convert the network stack
> one protocol family at a time instead of in one big lump.
>
> Stubbing off the sysfs and sysctl interfaces in the first round for the
> non-default namespaces as you have done should be good enough.
>
> The reason for the suggestion is that most of the work for the protocol
> stacks ipv4 ipv6 af_packet af_unix is largely noise, and simple
> replacement without real design work happening. Mostly it is just
> tweaking the code to remove global variables, and doing a couple
> lookups.
How that proposal differs from the initial Daniel's patchset ? how far was
that patchset to reach a similar agreement ?
OK, i wear blue socks :), but I'm not advocating a patchset more than
another i'm just looking for a shorter path.
thanks,
C.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
