Re: [patch 2/6] [Network namespace] Network device sharing by view

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrey Savochkin wrote:
Hi Daniel,

Hi Andrey,


It's good that you kicked off network namespace discussion.
Although I wish you'd Cc'ed someone at OpenVZ so I could notice it earlier :).

[email protected] ?

When a device presents an skb to the protocol layer, it needs to know to which
namespace this skb belongs.
Otherwise you would never get rid of problems with bind: what to do if device
eth1 is visible in namespace1, namespace2, and root namespace, and each
namespace has a socket bound to 0.0.0.0:80?

Exact. But, the idea was to retrieve the namespace from the routes.

IMHO, I think there are roughly 2 network isolation implementation:

	- make all network ressources private to the namespace

- keep a "flat" model where network ressources have a new identifier which is the network namespace pointer. The idea is to move only some network informations private to the namespace (eg port range, stats, ...)


  Daniel.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux