Re: [patch 0/3] 2.6.17 radix-tree: updates and lockless

On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> No, our hardware interrupt numbers are an encoded form containing the
> geographical location of the device :) so they are 24 bits at least (and
> we have a platform coming where they can be 64 bits).

PICs with build in GPSses? And I thought we had weird hardware....

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 0/3] 2.6.17 radix-tree: updates and lockless
  - From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch 0/3] 2.6.17 radix-tree: updates and lockless
  - From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/3] 2.6.17 radix-tree: updates and lockless
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/3] 2.6.17 radix-tree: updates and lockless
  - From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/3] 2.6.17 radix-tree: updates and lockless
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/3] 2.6.17 radix-tree: updates and lockless
  - From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/3] 2.6.17 radix-tree: updates and lockless
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/3] 2.6.17 radix-tree: updates and lockless
  - From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: cfq-iosched.c:RB_CLEAR_COLOR
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/25] Decouple IRQ issues (MSI, i386, x86_64, ia64)
Previous by thread: Re: [patch 0/3] 2.6.17 radix-tree: updates and lockless
Next by thread: Re: [patch 0/3] 2.6.17 radix-tree: updates and lockless
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]