Re: [PATCH] m68k: bogus constraints in signal.h

Hi,

On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Al Viro wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 01:46:55PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Al Viro wrote:
> > 
> > > bfset and friends need "o", not "m" - they don't work with autodecrement
> > > memory arguments.  bitops.h had it fixed, signal.h hadn't...
> > 
> > I have a better version for this one pending, which I have queued for 
> > 2.6.18.
> 
> Could you post it?

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-m68k-cvscommit&m=114954838727448&w=2

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] m68k: bogus constraints in signal.h
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] m68k: bogus constraints in signal.h
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] m68k: bogus constraints in signal.h
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: 2.6.17-rc6 does not boot on HP dc7600u - MCFG area is not E820-reserved
• Next by Date: Network drivers - porting to 2.6 issues
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] m68k: bogus constraints in signal.h
• Next by thread: [PATCH] m68k traps.c constraints
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]