Re: bad command responsiveness Proliant DL 585

here is the output of SysRq-T and SysRq-M:

http://www.dworf.com/sysrq.txt

any ideas?

thanks


Mike Galbraith wrote:

Does top freeze if started from an mlockall(MCL_PRESENT|MCL_FUTURE)
shell running at realtime priority?

Try SysRq-T and SysRq-M during freezes to gather info about VM and task
state during freeze.

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: bad command responsiveness Proliant DL 585
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>

• References:
  • bad command responsiveness Proliant DL 585
    • From: David Osojnik <[email protected]>
  • Re: bad command responsiveness Proliant DL 585
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 7/8] lock validator: s390 use raw_spinlock in mcck handler
• Next by Date: Re: [uml-devel] [UML] Problems building and running 2.6.17-rc4 on x86-64
• Previous by thread: Re: bad command responsiveness Proliant DL 585
• Next by thread: Re: bad command responsiveness Proliant DL 585
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]