David Miller wrote: >To be honest I'm all for some kind of bayesian filter at vger as long >as the rejected postings go somewhere into a folder I can scan every >couple of days looking for false positives. For what it's worth, there's an awful lot of spam that makes it past vger's filters to me that also then goes on to not get caught by my (very well trained) bogofilter. In other words, I'm not sure how much this would add. Of course if it's instead of some of the current vger filtering it will almost certainly be worthwhile. -Ath -- - Athanasius = Athanasius(at)miggy.org / http://www.miggy.org/ Finger athan(at)fysh.org for PGP key "And it's me who is my enemy. Me who beats me up. Me who makes the monsters. Me who strips my confidence." Paula Cole - ME
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- VGER does gradual SPF activation (FAQ matter)
- From: Matti Aarnio <[email protected]>
- Re: VGER does gradual SPF activation (FAQ matter)
- From: Folkert van Heusden <[email protected]>
- Re: VGER does gradual SPF activation (FAQ matter)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: VGER does gradual SPF activation (FAQ matter)
- From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: VGER does gradual SPF activation (FAQ matter)
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- VGER does gradual SPF activation (FAQ matter)
- Prev by Date: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] stack overflow checking for x86_64 / 2.6
- Previous by thread: Re: VGER does gradual SPF activation (FAQ matter) - Alternative
- Next by thread: Re: VGER does gradual SPF activation (FAQ matter)
- Index(es):
 |