On Thursday 08 June 2006 03:57, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:37:23PM +0200, Joachim Fritschi wrote:
> >
> > diff -uprN linux-2.6.17-rc5/crypto/Makefile linux-2.6.17-rc5.twofish/crypto/Makefile
> > --- linux-2.6.17-rc5/crypto/Makefile 2006-06-07 18:43:24.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.6.17-rc5.twofish/crypto/Makefile 2006-06-04 13:59:27.949797218 +0200
> > @@ -32,3 +32,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_MICHAEL_MIC) += mich
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32C) += crc32c.o
> >
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_TEST) += tcrypt.o
> > +
> > +twofish-objs := twofish_c.o twofish_common.o
>
> What do we gain by renaming twofish.c to twofish_c.c?
Solve the naming conflict when compiling. Seemed to me like it is impossible to create a
twofish.o out of twofish.o and twofish_common.o . And since having the original module name
seemed more important to me i changed the name. I didn't find any other way in documentation
of the kernel makefiles. I hope this isn't another newbie mistake. =)
-Joachim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
