Re: klibc - another libc?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> To be able to *require* it, which means it can't significantly bloat
> the total size of the kernel image.  klibc binaries are *extremely*
> small.  Static kinit is only a few tens of kilobytes, a lot of which
> is zlib.

Every project starts small and has the annoying tendency to grow.
That still doesn't answer, why it has to be distributed with the kernel, 
just install the thing somewhere under /lib and Kbuild can link to it. The 
point is that it contains nothing kernel specific and doesn't has to be 
rebult with every new kernel.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux