Hello,
> First off - the below does not even remotely resemble a Kbuild file.
> There are a shitload of deinitions not used by kbuild etc etc.
> Parallels should ship a Kbuild file instead with the kernel specific
> things included and be done with it. This works for others and they
> do not need to generate their Makefile using autotools.
agreed.
> What your patch did was to remove a fundamental part of the build system
> - and I'm suprised that you actually managed to build something.
my patch does not removes anything it just moves one line a few lines
down (as it was before your commit 20a468b51325b...:
--- a/scripts/Makefile.build
+++ b/scripts/Makefile.build
@@ -10,12 +10,11 @@ __build:
# Read .config if it exist, otherwise ignore
-include .config
| -include scripts/Kbuild.include
| -
/ # The filename Kbuild has precedence over Makefile
/ kbuild-dir := $(if $(filter /%,$(src)),$(src),$(srctree)/$(src))
| include $(if $(wildcard $(kbuild-dir)/Kbuild), $(kbuild-dir)/Kbuild, $(kbuild-dir)/Makefile)
\
`-> +include scripts/Kbuild.include
include scripts/Makefile.lib
ifdef host-progs
> I suggest that you ask the Parallels people to create a clean solution
> for the 2.6 kernel - seeking inspiration in Documentation/kbuild/*
> and when this works tweak it minimally to support the 2.4 kernel.
I will.
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
