On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Andrew Morton wrote: > Thanks, Christoph. So we get to keep the crappy test? Well at least as long as we have not established that it is not needed. > I wonder what LTP was corrupting before it started to corrupt page > migration data? Whatever came after the swap_info array. What does the System map say on that platform? > The above looks like a 2.6.17 thing to me. Right. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- 2.6.17-rc5-mm1
- From: Martin Bligh <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1
- From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1
- From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1
- From: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1
- From: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1
- From: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1
- From: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1
- From: Martin Bligh <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- 2.6.17-rc5-mm1
- Prev by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC 3/5] sched: Add CPU rate hard caps
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Twofish cipher - x86_64 assembler
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1
- Index(es):
 |