* Alan Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> Unfortunately we've got a load of handlers that just blindly say "Yes
> I handled something" so they bogusly cause completion to be assumed.
>
> We'd actually have to know if the IRQ source had "gone away" on the
> chip I fear.
ok. Then lets keep what we have right now, and first do the
disable/enable_irq_handler() API, and once the commonly used drivers are
covered by the new disable/enable API, apply the unconditional
desc->depth check to irqpoll?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
